.png){kind=small}
Paste a LinkedIn post and see how it scores on hook, value, readability, CTA and virality — with a hook tip and concrete fixes.
Rules-based, not AI, so the score is consistent. It rates five dimensions:
It also suggests a stronger hook and the specific fixes to lift the weakest dimension.
A post that opens “Here are my thoughts on sales…” scores low on hook and readability. Swap the first line for “I lost a $40k deal because of one word in my follow-up.” and break the body into one-line paragraphs, and hook, readability and virality all climb.
80+ posts reliably. 60–79 usually has one soft spot, often the hook. Below 60 is normally a weak first line or a wall of text, both cheap to fix before you publish.
Five rules-based dimensions: hook, value, readability, call to action and virality. It also suggests a stronger hook and specific fixes. No AI, so the score is consistent.
Posts scoring 80 or higher tend to perform. Below 60 usually means a weak hook or a wall-of-text that does not skim well in the feed.
A specific first line built on curiosity or tension that still reads well when the feed truncates it after a line or two.
No AI, and it is free, one run per email.
We build and run outbound for a living. This tool is the same thinking we apply to client campaigns, packaged as something you can use in seconds with no signup beyond a single email. If you would rather have the whole system built and run for you, that is what Provena does — see the results.